generosity instead of selfishness;
peace in a culture that seems to be addicted to conflict;
non-violence in a world bent on retribution;
compassion when turning away towards comfort is easier.
This is the blog of Lindsay Mack, the pastor at Luther Memorial Church and these are the sermons delivered there, available to everyone who seeks to hear what we discern about God's will for all of us.
My mom’s family is from beautiful farm in northeastern Nebraska. As a teenager, my mom and her sister, my Aunt Willa, worked the nightshift at a factory in a nearby at a plant that processed eggs. The yokes and whites were dehydrated into powder that could be used in cake mixes. As a kid, I heard many stories about “the egg-plant.” Workers wore big plastic aprons, stood at an assembly line, and cracked the eggs that came down the belt. If an egg were rotten, the worker dumped it (and there were many a rotten egg). This was not exactly a dream summer job for a teenager…
My aunt now lives on the farm where she and my mom grew up and a few years ago she pointed to the top of the south hill and told me, that on their way home after the night shift at the egg-plant, tired as they were, they would park the car at the highest point with a view of the rolling farms hills where they would pause and enjoy the sunrise. Then, they’d head home to sleep.
In 1910, a labor activist Helen Todd said in a speech, that we need “bread for all, and roses too.”
On one hand, beauty is in the eye of the beholder. (I, personally, think a lilac bush in bloom smells beautiful. I also find beauty in an inspiring speech, a line of music, a familiar voice, and kids laughing.) Beauty often seems to stir something in us. Many times it makes us feel good. But is beauty actually a need?
Our Lenten series is on different things we need: We need change and rest. We need people to be vulnerable and to advocate for one another. But beauty…is that really something we need? Here in the US, beauty is equated with luxury. Money buys access to museums, concerts and nature—they’re a luxury. In the city, wealthier neighborhoods have more green space and more trees. When cash gets tight in school districts, one of the first things to be cut is music or art. They are seen as extras. In that vein, it seems that beauty isn’t a need after all.
While our culture says that beauty is a luxury, our faith heritage disagrees. Our sacred spaces are beautiful, the acoustics are striking in our sanctuary. Scripture speaks of beauty: descendants that will outnumber the stars of the Milky Way, hospitality shared with strangers, loaves and fish in the hands of a child, thunder on the mountain, the first light of resurrection morning. Our reading from Isaiah tells of streams in the desert and a way in the wilderness. And then, there is the jar of nard in today’s gospel story.
In the story, Mary pours the ointment all over Jesus’ feet and as the perfume envelopes the room, beauty floods the space. Then, she bends over Jesus feet, and as she wipes them with her long hair, everyone falls quiet watching. That is, except Judas who takes this moment to get up on his high and mighty moral horse. “Why,” he asks, “was this perfume not sold for 300 denarii and the money given to the poor?” Who knows what was behind his question—Judas is not exactly our most noble character in the bible, but at face value, I admit, his question resonates: Why waste money on this beautiful thing when there are so many people in need?
********
In 1836, Ralph Waldo Emerson, wrote about simple visit to a beautiful forest.
Egotism. It’s that thing where we talk and think and focus constantly on ourselves. Egotism, (along with self-absorption and selfishenss) is a social ill that plagues us. There are a lot of reasons for it, but over the years, we’ve exaggerated the individual self. Do I have enough money? Does my body look the right way? Is my life right? We’ve become more narcissistic. (They can measure it.(1)) There’s a heightened sense of superiority, arrogance, and even entitlement. It’s a kind of sinfulness that causes us to curve in on ourselves while others’ concerns or pains or worries fade on the sidelines. There in the woods, Emerson realized, his self-absorption and "mean egoism" fades with the beauty around him.
Have you ever seen something beautiful—a big, wide open blue sky, or perhaps you’ve heard a beautiful speech or an extraordinary piece of music? And, with this, you’re transported out of your head and your problems and issues fade a little in importance. There was a philosopher named Iris Murdoch who once explained that when you see something beautiful, such as a bird lifting off, it pulls you out of yourself. Beauty, she said, “unselfs us.” (2)
A lot of our problems in our world might be connected to the sinfulness of too much self. Beauty is a way of, as she put it, non-selfing or getting out of ourselves: A little less “I” and a little more “we.” (It’s wild--neuroscientists have measured how this happens in our brains(3)).
Part of me doubts that the disciples were as self-obsessed as we are today. Martha, who was serving dinner that night (God bless her) wasn’t fine-tuning her personal brand of “Servant-Hearted Martha.” The brothers, Peter and Andrew, were not subtly checking their phones to see how many likes they were getting on those updates about Jesus the raising Lazarus from the dead. The disciple Peter, who I sometimes imagine as the impulsive resident stress ball of the group, wasn’t over in the corner biting his nails and trying to get a handle on his anxiety.
While Mary’s gift of the lavish ointment that anointed Jesus was generous and admirable, I’m not sure that her act of moral beauty needed to pull them out of an individualized world-view the way beauty needs to pull us out of ours in this day and age.
And, beauty can shake us out of our egoism. Beauty, art, nature, music, a sunset at the top of the hill—all of it--can pull us out of ourselves. So, do we need beauty? Yes. We do.
But why? Let’s take one more turn with this idea because I wonder if beauty does something more in this bible reading and if it can do something more for us today. But I’m going to have to tell you another story first, to show you what I mean:
*******
In 1931, a young man named Charles Black Junior was headed to a dance in Austin, Texas, his hometown. He was 16 years old. Charles was from an easy side of the city and attended the great school of Austin High. As he walked down the street with his buddy, he was struck still by the sound of a trumpet player. (I first heard this story in an interview with Sarah Lewis (4). Lewis is an art historian and professor. She’s Black. Charles, in this story, is White. Later, I searched for Lewis’ written version of the story.)
So Charles hears this musician there on the street. Lewis writes that, “The trumpet player, a jazz musician, performed largely with his eyes closed, sounding out notes, ideas, laments, sonnets that had never before existed…His music sounded like an utter transcendence.” Charles is listening there on the street with his buddy who was a “good ole’ boy” from Austin High. His friend also senses the power of this music and the way it “rumbled the ground underneath him,” as Lewis put it. His friend finally shakes his head, Lewis writes, “as if clearing it and as if prying himself out of a trance.” The friend mutters a racial epithet and walks away. Charles, meanwhile, continues listening and becomes certain that he was in the presence of a genius. Indeed he was: The trumpet player was 30 year old Louis Armstrong.
In that moment, the music cracks something in Charles’ mind or heart: As Lewis explained it, here you’ve got this teenage White kid who, up until this point, thinks the whole segregated world around him is set up correctly and he sees genius in this Black man on the street. It is beyond words. Sarah Lewis calls the music, and this beauty, an “asthetic force.” It completely blew Charles’ mind. It turned him upside down and changed his life trajectory. Some years later, after law school, he went on to work with Thurgood Marshall (the first Black supreme court justice) to write the winning brief in Brown vs. the Board of Education (which led to desegregation of schools.) And, apparently, every year until he died, he hosted a Louis Armstrong listening night.
I don’t want to get too far away from our bible story, but, I can’t help but wonder if Mary pouring that nard out was as arresting of a moment as this one on the street corner in Austin.
It turns out that beauty not only gets us out of ourselves, it can blow our minds and change us. Sarah Lewis said that beauty “slips in the back door of our rational thought and gets us to see the world differently.” Just when we think we’ve got it all figured out, Beauty can zoom us out. We see a bigger world than our small minds. We see systems and connections. Beauty unselfs us.
In her book, The Unseen Truth (5),” Lewis wrote about the way James Baldwin had said that artistic photographs could change people. People didn’t understand at the time. But, it proved true: the “asthetic force” of photos changed people. There were pictures of the civil rights movement, or of the war in Vietnam—often with their jarring, painful beauty--that were transformative. There was that gorgeous photo, “The Blue Green Marble” taken in 1972 of our planet earth hanging there in the darkness of space. The beauty of that photo astonished, dazzled and shocked us. It blew our minds. It catalyzed movements.
It is not so much what beauty is, but what it does to us.
That evening, long ago in ancient Galilee, What did the beauty of the scent of nard, and the moral beauty of Mary’s gift of service, do to the people gathered there? What does it do to us?
That moment there mattered—Jesus told Judas as much. Did it crystalize the truth that Jesus’ message and life was bigger than the individual moment? That God’s goodness would liberate people—all people—from bondage? That even in the midst of selfish, horrific, greedy and sinful systems, that love would prevail? Did beauty convict them? Give them courage? As the events of the terrible next week would unfolded starting with Jesus magnificent ride through the waving palms and then, in the terror of his arrest and crucifixion, the scent of that gift of nard would linger on Jesus body and in Mary’s hair. Would the beauty continue to remind them all of God’s goodness, dream and aliveness even when all seemed lost? Did beauty change them? give them courage? Commitment? Connection? I wonder.
“Give the people bread, but give them roses.” Seek beauty out, let it soften your spirits and inspire your actions. Fight for it. Open yourselves to it. Slow down for it. Search for it in the biggest and smallest places: in the sunsets, and the speeches, and the paintings, and the spring season that is coming back to life. For beauty leads us to see ourselves and the world differently. More than that—it leads us to—live differently.
This season of Epiphany is the time of our church year that takes us from the birth of Jesus all the up to Ash Wednesday and the beginning of Lent. Epiphany starts with the Magi who follow the star and then into the very early days of Jesus ministry where he changes water to wine, calls his disciples on the shores of the beach, and shares his very first words with his followers.
Something about this season always seems to be in step with lengthening of the winter days: Every day is just a little longer and there’s just a little more light. Each gospel passage we hear dials up the light just a little brighter.
Today, we hear these very first recorded words of Jesus in his ministry. This is his inaugural speech. With these words, he sets a vision, clarifies his priorities, and explains the scope of what he has set out to do.
We had a presidential inauguration last week. Inaugural addresses are important. Words matter because they have the power to shape the world around us. In the case of a presidential inauguration, the words that are shared set a vision for our country clarify our priorities. they influence action.
160 years ago President Abraham Lincoln spoke in his second inauguration speech about the need to resolve both the civil war and it’s evil cause of slavery. He spoke about how both sides of the North and South were to blame for that sin of slavery. He spoke to two sides that had been enmeshed in brutal violence and called for peace, self-reflection and forgiveness. His speech was short--not more than seven minutes--but it set the tone for the direction the country would take. Inaugural speeches always set the tone and inspire action. But regardless of who the leader is, we as people of faith stay close to God’s word, God’s story and lock into the values born out of God’s goodness.
In the case of Jesus’ inaugural words, he roots down into scripture and into his tradition to explain his extraordinary mission. He reads from Isaiah which harkened back to the law from Leviticus 25 where God will look to bring about the well-being of the community, specifically economic well-being. These words that Jesus read from Isaiah click right into one of the overarching themes of the bible: That folks who aren’t highly esteemed that those folks who don’t have access to the levers of the economy, that the people who face social obstacles that prevent them from getting a leg up, that all of these folks (the poor, the oppressed, the brokenhearted) are given special status in the heart of God. (1)
Often, very often, scripture refers to these folks as a trinity: Look after the widows, the orphans, and the foreigners the bible reminds us.(2) In the ancient world, these were the folks—widows, orphans and foreigners (or immigrants) who happened to face tremendous challenges to survive and much less get ahead. These were the folks on the very bottom rung. And, for some reason, these are the people that God holds especially close to the divine heart.
In his inaugural address, Jesus starts here. But this is not an easy place to start.
300 years before Christ, Plato taught in Athens that people were inherently unequal. Some people were just more valuable than others, he explained. Some are good at leading, thinking, math, philosophizing, and, some are not. If you’re good at it, you should get your just due. If, Plato would have said, you’re taking care of children, or laboring in the field, or doing something else, then you should also get your just due.
His philosophy went deeper: Some people, he explained, are more important than others: Some people, are men, some are…not. Some are free, some are enslaved. What was important, he taught, was to make sure that everyone got their just due. In fact, that was justice.
This view held for millennia. Google it. It undergirded feudalism (peasants were, of course, less important than lords and ladies.) It justified the slave trade and expansion into the Americas. This way of categorizing and ranking people held for generations. It worked its’ way into our psyche as humanity. Around 1700, when western thinkers began to question this, they appealed to an unexpected source: the bible. (3) Turns out, some of the earliest critiques of Plato’s philosophy come from scripture. In our reading from 1 Corinthians, St. Paul writes of the care and honor all the parts of the body merit. In Galatians, he writes that writes that there is neither "Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, all are one in Christ Jesus."
Jesus challenges this view many places in scripture saying that all those that are broken, heavy laden, burdened and oppressed are particularly held close in the heart of God. These barriers that categorized people and assigned different rank and value to folks, are vanquished in Christ. But that doesn’t mean the categories are gone. Some ways of thinking are hard to root out. For some reason, we still hang onto this idea that some people are more valuable than others. It is our faith that pulls us back like a magnet to the truth that all people, and even and particularly the vulnerable and forgotten, are beloved to God.
This is our charge from Jesus inaugural words: We are to pour love into siblings in need. We are to build what Jesus called the Kingdom of God or as MLK put it, “the beloved community.” We are to witness to the light of Jesus. Sadly though, this call to radical love doesn’t always find room in our hearts. It can be crowded other things:
1. By selfishness—an unwillingness to share, or a hyper focus on ourselves and my success, my problems, my worries. This blocks us from loving. Jesus read verses about economic justice which cut deep enough for some folks, that in the next bible scene, we read that some of the listeners were deeply offended and even furious. Sometimes, we convince ourselves that sharing will set us back.
2. Sometimes the barrier to following this call to radical love is cynicism: we think that nothing we do is ever going to make a difference, so why bother?
3. Another thing that can keep us from radical love is if we don’t like the people we’re supposed to love. What if the people who suffer and are close to God’s heart voted for someone different that I did? What if it’s a family member who is vulnerable, down on their luck, impoverished, but is also just plain old mean and so hard to love? Loving people even when they infuriate us and disappoint us and offend us—that is so hard. And there is no other answer than to disciple ourselves just do it. Thankfully, Jesus also announces in this reading that he is the fulfillment of this scripture. And we are not.
As I close I want to tell you a story from civil rights leader, Vincent Harding. At some point Harding told a story about a conversation he had in a hard neighborhood in Boston with a young man named Darryl. Darryl told Vincent that he felt like he was operating in a situation that, as he put it, was just “very, very dark.” He mentioned to Vincent that what he and his friends needed were, as he put it, some “sign posts to show them the way.” Some “lights shining out from other people’s lives” that would help them. Vincent was struck by the conversation and called these “live human signposts.”
He said that these human signposts would actually, stand there in the darkness and not run away from those who were hurting. In these shadowy times, he said, “we have to open up lights in the darkness. We have to be candles and signposts in the shadows” for each other, for those around us.
Earlier this week, I was talking with some church leaders about this moment in our society. I have to admit that there have been moments in the last week when I have felt heartsick about the news.
These church leaders and I talked about how it feels like things are breaking and that there are real human beings sitting there on the sharp edges of things as they splinter. And those folks are the vulnerable people that Jesus called us to: there are migrants. There are queer youth.
God cares about the folks on the sharp edges.
As I was talking with these LMC leaders, one ventured: “Maybe we could make a statement as a church about where we stand.” Maybe. Maybe we will make a statement. But, in the meantime, the truth is that you all are the church’s greatest statement. You are this statement through the way you interact with people, through the grace you show in your daily lives, through your insistence in getting out of yourselves to serve. The spirit of God moves among us and by God’s mysterious grace and prodding. You are the living signposts that go out into the world. You are the ones, with humility and integrity, to dial up the light. You are the ones to take Jesus inaugural words to heart, to match his tone, to follow his lead, to act on his words that call us to bind up the brokenhearted, to free the captives, to bring Good news to the poor, to comfort the mourning. By the grace of God, as it has been for ages with the church: you are the ones who are called to do justice, love mercy and walk humbly with God.
Jesus ministry was that of radical, inclusive, restorative love for all people and that kind of love doesn’t mess around. it is hard. This same holy love is alive around us today calling us to be the body of Christ and extend our hands into the world. I know that these are unusual times that we are living in but take heart and heed the call to reflect God’s light into the world and dial up the light. For love—love will show us the way.
(1) "Isaiah Westminster Bible Companion 44-66" Walter Bruggeman
(2) (A couple examples: Duet 10:14-19: Zech 17:10; Ex 22:21:24: Deut 26:12; Deut 27:19)
(3) leaned on analysis by Scott Black
In my last pastor job before I came to Luther Memorial, I coordinated a young adult international service program through the Lutheran church that was based in Mexico City. In this position, we lived in Mexico City and we placed young adults in social service agencies for a year of service. We were always on the lookout for new placement sites and over time, we formed relationships with a couple of great shelters for migrants where our volunteers served.
Given the nature of things around 10-12 years ago, immigration was becoming an increasingly contentious and politicized issue. The more our young adult volunteers learned about it, the more fired up they became; and their newsletters home to their sponsoring communities began to show it. Not all the sponsoring congregations shared the same passion for immigration that these young people did. In some cases, both sides dug their heels in.
Each winter, Omar and I traveled with the young adults up from Mexico City to the US/Mexico border for a week long retreat. We stayed in Tucson and spent time on both sides of the border learning about things. We met with non-profits, churches, and public defenders. We also met with the DEA and the Border Patrol. Before meeting with a group we might be quite ideologically different from, and particularly when we went into the actual the border patrol station and detention facility, I would gather my group around me and say, “Look, you may walk into this place with strong opinions, but we are here to learn and we must be open-hearted and respectful.” And they were. (if you know me, you’ll know I was saying this as much to myself as to them).
On one hand, the border patrol agents were what our group expected: they supported the policies and procedures that our young people thought were oppressive. But what always caught our group off guard was realizing that many of these folks were often profoundly compassionate and had saved more lives of people dying of dehydration than any of the rest of us and that they had all recovered countless bodies in the desert.
What also caught our group off guard was that these agents were folks with families, making an honest living, coaching sports, going to PTA meetings. One year, I remember, we met with an agent who was single mom who told me, as we walked through the parking lot, that she had a teenage child who was struggling in high school.
Sure, we learned about border policies (and believe me, it was always eye-opining), but it was also a structured encounter with someone with a very different perspective and we would often leave with this unsettling tenderness for the person we had been with.
Last week, I shared with you the story of the ancient pilgrimage ritual that people would participate in where they would climb the steps to the temple complex in Jerusalem and, after entering the doors, turn to the right and begin to process around the entire temple complex counterclockwise.
After processing around, folks would then exit close to where they had entered. Last week, I told you about the twist in the ancient writings: that if you happened to be a person who was suffering: a person who had experienced something awful, someone who was brokenhearted or in pain, you would walk through those same porticos, but instead of turning right with the masses, you would turn to the left and then process. As you walked against the current, people would meet you; and each person who passed would ask, “what happened?” And you would tell them of your worry or your pain and then receive their comfort and specifically, their blessing.
There is another group mentioned in that text. Another group that must turn to the left with the broken and bereaved, the lost and the lonely, and walk against the current. That was the socially ostracized.
Our world is so different to the world 2,000 ago. At the time this Mishna was written, the “ostracized person” was considered to have endangered the community in word or action. They had to physically distance themselves from the rest of the community by 6 feet. Sharon Braus suggests that a contemporary analogy might be a person who is incarcerated here in our society today.
If you can let your imaginations zoom out a little to consider this gap between yourself and some other person who might be on the other side of The Breach: Some of us here in this room have experienced the cracking of our times. Maybe all of us have. we know folks who have different perspectives on science. People who have fractured with family members or friends. In our congregation here, we have some level of ideological diversity and some occasional irritation with each other around a few things that are political, but we find our forward. Sometimes, we even talk about it.
But zooming out to folks who aren’t quite as homogenous we typically are, more and more, as we dig our heels in we see folks with different positions as not only impossible to understand but morally repugnant.
We do not want to bump into each other in the sacred circle. Let alone bestow any unnecessary blessings…
First, we mark a boundary around how we’re different. Next, folks become ideological foes. Then, folks become existential threats. Rabbi Nachman of Breslov said, centuries ago, that “It's not hard work to distance yourself from another person. The real work is to draw him close and lift him up.”
In our bible reading from Acts today, you had two people, Peter and Cornelius, who were very different people. Peter was a Jew, from the working class, and observed certain customs and rituals that defined him. He was a Jesus follower and had been in that room on the day of Pentecost when the Spirit had rushed in like a mighty wind and ignited tongues of fire on the heads of those gathered.
Cornelius was a gentile. He was a man of financial means, a military captain, and a man of great power and wealth. The two men were—by many measures—profoundly different.
Peter has long standing boundaries that have been internalized since childhood. Yes, there are the dietary laws, customs, purity rituals, But there are also ideological differences. Peter has experienced the ruling class to be oppressive. Cornelius, however, has benefited from his status in society. Though these two men are geographically close, in many ways, Peter and Cornelius are worlds apart and probably each comfortable in their group. On one hand, this isn’t a bad thing. We find meaning together and purpose, and a sense of belonging in our groups. But, the stronger those internal bonds are, the weaker the bonds can be to folks outside of our group.
In the case of Peter and Cornelius, God steps in and orchestrates this meeting between them. The bible story doesn’t detail their conversation but something in them certainly shifts and Peter famously realizes and then says that, “God shows no partiality.”
As the story concludes, the Holy Spirit rushes in again and falls upon Cornelius and all the and the church begins to burst out into the world.
******
In that temple processional ritual, The ancients had a ritualized way of encountering one another that illustrated that we are bound up together. All the folks entered into that holy temple. Everyone entered at the same gate. Everyone circled. And when people encountered each other, even those who ostracized or deemed to be a social hazard, people asked them, “what happened?” And all of them were blessed.
When I stood with my young adults in the parking lot out side of the border patrol station in the blazing Arizona sun, I said to them, “You can have your opinions. You can have your feelings. I’m not asking you to surrender them or even compromise. But we are here to learn. We are safe here and we are here to be curious.”
Many folks have said that curiosity is the birthplace of compassion. Research has shown that our stereotypes about people actually reinforce neural patterns in our brains. We have these engrained neural paths in our thinking. When you are genuinely curious about a person you may hold a deep stereotype about that is like neurological off-roading in our brain because you are pushing off of those established pathways. Sharon Braus says that we “Need a spiritual rewiring that helps us see one another in our pain, fear, joy, yearning, humanity.”
Thinking of that ancient pilgrimage circle, one rabbi reflected that “the hearts of the ostracized are blessed so that that he hearts of the community might open to them. So that the community might understand their anguish.” So that everyone might understand.
This kind of vulnerable, open-hearted engagement is counter instinctual. We are actually not wired this way. I’m not saying that each adversary is righteous. But I am saying that we long for healed hearts and a healed world and that means there must be space for all of us. As St. Peter said there, face to face with his foe, Cornelius, “God shows no partiality.” God loves us all.
**********
Omar and I took groups back to that border station several times over the years we lived in Mexico. By the time our last year rolled around and I reached out for a meeting for my group, I was told that they were no longer making appointments with community groups. And no, we were no longer welcome to visit the border patrol station.
It is not easy to find this kind of encounter. Maybe it’s easier for you than it is for me. Ideological bubbles are real, though we can challenge our stereotypes. We can also subtly train heart muscles, we can quietly fine-tune our ability to love, through small habits and practices that we repeat. We can train ourselves to see holiness in the random people we encounter in a day. In the grocery store, at the stoplight. We can open ourselves to curiosity and seek to learn about folks who are different from us.
The rebuilding of our broken world—in fact, the redemption of creation--begins between you and me. Between you and the person bumping into you in the circle. It happens one relationship at a time. And, there is room for all of us.